Is it arrogant or accurate to say that all of the arguments for creationism have been debunked?

If you think about the bulk of arguments that creationists use ... Paley's teleological argument, Anselm's ontological argument, Pascal's wager ... and all the times that they've been refuted in an argument ... is it accurate to say that we've successfully debunked all the arguments for creationism, or it is arrogant to do so?